|
Helping Friends of Hayfield
As the assistant executive director for the historical preservation association assisting Friends of Hayfield, you completed the outline on the adjudicative process and gave it to the trustees for their review. As a result of the conclusions in your outline, the trustees would like you to ensure that their concerns are heard during the public participation process to condemn Hayfield Estates. Since the trustees are unfamiliar with the public participation requirements under administrative law, they would like you to develop a second outline that would highlight those public participation requirements. Specifically, Friends of Hayfield would like you to identify all of the formal and informal public participation options under the law that the Department of Transportation might use during the condemnation process. They would like to know what their legal obligations are related to their participation in any or all of these forums. They would also like to know what type of information they would need to present to the Department of Transportation in order to make a strong legal case that Hayfield Estates should not be condemned and an alternate site should be chosen. Finally, they would like a recommendation on their ability to save Hayfield Estates from condemnation. Facts of the Case: Friends of Hayfield Before developing the second outline, re-familiarize yourself with the facts of the case. In addition to fulfilling the specifics of the assignment, a successful outline must also meet the following criteria: • Length should be 1-2 pages, excluding cover page and references; in 10-12 point font (Arial, Courier, and Times New Roman are acceptable). • Assignment should follow the conventions of Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.). • Writing should be well ordered, logical and unified, as well as original and insightful • Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics • Appropriate citation style should be followed. |
