Baptist History: A reader in the Theology of a Christian People
Introduction
The book, Baptist History: A reader in the Theology of a Christian People by talks of the history of the Baptist church, how Christians formed it and the developmental changes that took place in the church over the centuries. The book summarizes the happenings of Baptist church. The book also talks of what it means to be a Baptist. The book introduces a couple of Baptist thinkers who define what it means to be a Baptist. These representatives play a crucial role in the Baptist thinking and believe that the church be separated from the state. These representatives believe that the church be left alone to make decisions on its own without the influence of the government.
The Baptist people believe that the church should have its own freedom to do what it feels regarding the work of God. The book takes a view that is comprehensive about Baptist people, their beliefs and what they stand for. The book notes the history of Baptist church from when it formed in the fifteenth century to where it is now. The book also talks of how people in the fifteenth century fought to free the church from the government. John Leland, for example, in the book fights for freedom of people to worship freely without the fear of government prohibition.
Â
Major strengths and contributions learned from the book.
The book tells us of the why the Baptist church came to be. From the book, we learn that the theology of the Baptist church aimed at addressing the issues about Protestantism. Protestantism came to be when a number of people cut ties from the Catholic Church and went ahead to form other churches. Most of these people did not agree to the doctrines that the Catholic Church practiced. The book justifies the establishment of Protestantism and its relation to philosophy and modern science. The book applauded for providing an excellent resource of information for works by theologians and interested in comprehending the identity of the Baptist church.
The book gives a comprehensive review of the Baptist culture. The book clearly outlines the activities of the Baptist people from century to century. This includes the statements given by the representatives of Baptists who played a vital role in the development of the Baptist vision. One of the key players is Thomas Munzer. While instructed by his head, Conrad Grebel, to tell Baptist followers that the government may not protect them, he makes an appeal to the king. He tells the king (King James I) that he should not try to be as a spiritual lord over his subjects.
Another major strength of the book is that it comprises of the works of early authors of the Anabaptist culture. Some of the authors remarkably known for writing about the history of the Baptist church include J.M. Carroll and Nat Turner. The works of these authors, however, do not attest to one another. This book, Baptist History: A reader in the Theology of a Christian People edited by Freeman, McClendon and Velloso, however, gives a more comprehensive summary that that of Carroll and Turner. The editors of this book include the works of Takashi Yamada and Osadolor Imasogie. These two are early authors of Anabaptist who propagated the Baptist theology and vision.
Frustrations and/or weaknesses about the book
The book also has u number of weaknesses and frustrations. The authors in the book fail to tell us why the Baptist church does not have literature of the church. It also fails to outline the theological tradition of the Baptist church. The Baptist church has some influential members who are socially and economically stable, but this has not stopped the members from receiving mockery from other churches. It is the belief that the Baptist church lags behind from other churches such as Methodist and catholic. Another frustration brought out in the book is that the authors do not prove that the Baptist church and its beliefs speaks in universalistic terms. For the approval of a theology, then it has to speak in universalistic terms.
Another weakness of the book is that it fails to protect the Baptists’ way of seeing things. The Baptists view and see things from below. In this sense, they get things from a backward point of view. They see ethics before they do doctrines, reasons before a conviction and Christianity before faith. There is no acceptation of this as it should be the opposite.
The book fails to talk about the concept of theology in depth. The book fails to analyze this subject critically in relation to Baptist. The Baptist people practice religion intellectually which means like a study of the Christian religion. Conviction would not be the main aim for this. Many people do not accept this. The book fails to account for this. The book also does not talk about the doctrines that the church should teach in order for it to be considered as a church.
