Women and terrorism
Terrorism is the act of influencing resolution by use of coercion vices that create a rather controversial incentive that forces the affected to abide by the perpetrators agenda. Although most perpetrators who abide by the virtue of terrorism partake in the scheme for objective reasons, an equal predefined number of them also take part in the activity without refutable reasons resulting from divine factors such as religion and undying loyalty that forces an individual to engage in such activity. According to Bernard Lewis article, existence of terrorism especially aimed at to the Americans or more generally, the western community is allegedly associated to the Muslim community. This is with the exception of the notorious Iranian mullahs and their followers who abide to the conviction of religion as their premise for the cause. A general part of the world with a larger constitute of the third world counties has a problem with the western countries. Believers in a cause for terrorism in western countries that have taken the initiative to act as spokes people of the oppressed countries claim that terrorism is now apparently a justification to a means for ends. Terror threat does not imply to them as Americans or westerners but rather as human beings and more so to the human nature. Women partake in revolutionary endeavors from denial of their equal share of importance in the society as opposed to the male gender. Terrorism to women presents a vice that would help them influence the world and more so testify to their presence as equally matched to perform agendas of significant magnitudes. Moreover, terrorism acts serve religious or ethno-nationalist purposes are a common attraction to the women community willing to engage in terrorism.
Left wing terrorism whose main resolve is to overturn the capitalist government and replace it with a socialist one plays a vital attraction to the women community mostly from its conservative laws that do not abide to the default understanding of the women community. Left wing ability to provide women with the chance to play roles in leadership or allow for their input in leadership decision acts as a great factor for its preference. Women in terrorism attribute most of its prevalence from factors that border more on traditional and conservative reasons, as opposed to noninterventionist ones. The ability of left-wing terrorism to go against most of the norms that characterize Islamic countries with emphasis to the code of conduct that dictates to women their way of life but rather offers women the platform to make their own decision without restriction and overlook is a key reason for them choosing the tactic, as opposed to others. The concept of gender role reversal presents progress to the continued war of equality among the female gender. Bernard concedes to the fact that the treatment of women in the western countries has the reputation of being inhumane but also realizes the same treatment of women forced to polygamy or become concubines is a universal aspect. With this concept, women have a valid reason to fight for their rights to equality and esteem in the society. Terrorism plays a part in the scenario by providing the vice to initiate progress on the agenda and with the left wing terrorism strategy; they have the higher ground in the capability to affirm their value to the society and to the doubtful especially of the opposite gender. With the right wing advocating for the continued existence of the default aspects that include the traditional aspects assumed sacred or divine, the left wing does the exact opposite by calling for changes hence being the main reason for the preference of the method.
