Generic Marking and Feedback Key
Content & Structure Low Proficiency Developing Proficiency Moderate Proficiency High Proficiency
Introduced the topic or problem
Identify the purpose or position
Overall plan of the essay or report
Developed a position or argument
Correct paraphrasing if applicable
Literature Review/Research
Appropriate depth &breadth of research
Analysed the information critically
Evidence to Support Position
Demonstrate understanding of the problem
Selection of appropriate evidence
Effectively synthesize both elements
Conclusion
Integrates the argument
Provides a definite conclusion
Supported by body of essay or report
Academic Writing Skills
Appropriate level of sophistication& word choice
Adherence to referencing protocols
Spelling,grammar& sentence structure
Clarity of expression
Appropriate reference page
Marking Guide
Grades Depth and breadth of Coverage Critical Elements Structure, Language and Conventions
High Distinction 80 – 100% All aspects of the questions were addressed and researched in great depth The written work shows great depth of thought, excellent development of argument, logical analysis and insight into the subject. All aspects of the written work conform to a high academic/professional standard.
Distinction 70 – 79% Most aspects of the question were addressed and researched in great depth. The written work shows some evidence of analysis, supported by logical argument and insight into the subject. Most aspects of the written work conform to a high academic / professional standard.
Credit Pass 60 – 69% Most aspects of the question were addressed and researched adequately. The written work shows evidence of elementary analysis and the development of argument. Most aspects of the written work conform to an acceptable academic / professional standard.
Pass
50 – 59% Basic aspects of the question were addressed and researched adequately. The written work is mainly descriptive, showing basic understanding of the topic. The written work displays basic structure.
Fail
<50% Responses were superficial and / or inadequately addressed the question. The written work demonstrates limited understanding of the topic. The written work is not of an academic / professional standard.
Mark: %
