Animal liberation
Summary
Animals, Men and Morals are a proposal towards an Animal Liberation association. The assessors to the book might not all view the issue in a similar manner. They are a different group. Philosophers, varying from experts to mark off students, structure the largest unconfirmed. There exist five of them, together with the three editors, and there is a take out from the unfairly treated and abandoned German theorist with an English surname, Leonard Nelson, who passed away in the year 1927. There are compositions by two writers and reviewers. The extra pieces are composed by a mental doctor, a botanist, a sociologist, and Ruth Harrison, who is almost certainly best defined as an expert activist for animal interests.
Analysis
The fundamental grounds that have been explained by Jeremiah Bentham in his infamous solution have taken the interests of many people and activists. The interests of man on the welfare of wildlife had to be taken into consideration and treated in a similar manner as the focus of other theorists. Moral theorists stated in the book have presented alike points on the interests in diverse manners. The concern that most people are have are not supposed to rely on whether the own certain features, only what that worry is about, and its variance to the features themselves.
There have been several movements addressing aspects such as homosexuality, feminism, racism and many others in the recent years across the globe. It has never occurred to many people that other liberations can come up as well since they have always thought that all have been exhausted. This is however not the case and according to Singer, another movement can emanate from men animals and ethics (1946). Some psychologists, botanists, and socialists have come up with movements that support the welfare of animals. They have demanded for a complete change in the attitudes of human beings towards animals.
Animal liberation does not sound like a serious concept and many may argue that movements such as racism, sexuality are significant because they concern themselves with human beings who have great capabilities such as a brain that can think and make rational decisions. Such individuals may add that human beings are superior to animals and hence cannot be compared to them. In addition, since justice necessitates that equals be treated the same, undermining animals can not considered as a crime. The author emphasizes that equality should not be equated to intellectual quotient.
Despite the fact that movements such as racism have claimed that there is no difference between the genetic makeup in blacks and whites, there is no solid proof to such assertions. The author explains further that there is a difference between moral parity and factual equality. In the study of some of the animals, the author reviews statements made by animal liberalists on a diverse study upon different animals. For, instance, Jane Goodall studied a number of chimpanzees their expressions of emotions in comparison with man, man has a tendency of falling back on the nonlinguistic versions of communicating.
The sense of specism is frequently most significant in the practice of studying animals’ in order to have some sort of gaining towards man. The issue is not engaged in discussion very often, making it very widespread in man’s laboratories’, which are covered through allegations. The people defending the experiments that are carried out on the animals cannot utilize these aspects of the animals as they need pressures arising from the similarities that man shares with animals. The scientists who give lab rats the choice between hunger and electric shocks with the aim of knowing if the rats can develop ulcers do such actions knowing that the rats share a similar nervous system as man.
The discussion concerning the use of animals in all artificial experiments by man has always missed the main concept as the theorists have put the situation in absolutists’ terms. The writer puts precise conditions and terminology to explain the circumstances involved when posing the animals to risk in the name of saving the larger population. The writer asks if the same situation could be applied in the case of man, where the abolitionist is willing to use an orphan to experiment on to save a lot of human lives. The author stresses the fact that the same infant shares similar feelings as apes and other grown animals, making them very well aware of the proceedings that the scientists are enhancing upon them.
Factory farming is an activity that the writer has engaged the animal liberation discussion in. factory farming has advocates such as john Harris, who has been considered rather sketchy. The theorist had said that the animals don’t usually feel anything in the course of the experiments because they are not aware of anything. The writer further objects the statement by explaining that animal behavior does not always comprise of expressions that are learnt, but also of the natural and instinct type of feelings. With regards from experts on the population of animals and their behavior, the author is able to stress out the concept of animal instinct use in the lives and activities throughout the animals’ lives.
Conclusion
The arguments that are presented in the book by the author all have reference from various theorists throughout the globe. However, their validity is what has been scrutinized, in relation with the rights and expressions that the animals portray when under human pressure. Basically, the value o the life of an animal has to be gotten from the delights that life itself has over them. Their lives can then be balanced as the emotions of pain and delight are equally felt by man and animals. Rearing the animals should therefore be based on balance of the emotions, only if man aims at producing animals and letting them live without any pain or harm.
