Do not spend longer than three minutes (around 350words) summarizing the readings. The remainder of the presentation should focus on noteworthy ideas within the readings, be they productive or problematic, illustrative examples and case-studies from outside of the readings, and the provision of at least five provocative questions for discussion after the presentation. This approach will prove implicitly that you engaged with the readings. Avoid simple reiteration devoid of critical, synthetic, or analytical thought. When
formulating questions, think of the greater debates that arise, or could arise, in the topic; ask questions that you know will spark such debate. Also, “why” and “how” questions are sometimes (though not always) preferable in that they demand more articulate, nuanced responses than “what” or “do” questions that usually often generate lists or yes/no answers. Mostly importantly, this discussion launch will hopefully inspire an engaging and exciting subsequent discussion.
This is a presentation, I want it be interesting. I want to divide my 10 min presentation into 3 parts. First use whitney cumming’s talkshow to introduce the topic. ( This is the whitney cummings talk show http://www.56.com/u42/v_OTU4MzA5NzU.html 13:59-14:50 she mentioned women and cars i think this will be an interesting begin) and introduce the topic.Then is summary of 3 articles (around 35o words), briefly talk these three article. You can put the summary of 3 article together, or summarize one article talk something relevantly, those relevant thing’s will be the third part, should focus on noteworthy ideas within the readings, be they productive or problematic, illustrative examples and case-studies from outside of the readings, and the provision of at least five provocative questions for discussion after the presentation. I ordered 1 page summary of my paper. I need 5 critical questions, and need answer for it.
The article should be read is as followed:
Blumenberg, E. 2004. “En-gendering Effective Planning: Spatial Mismatch, Low-Income Women, and Transportation Policy.” Journal of the American Planning Association 70(3):269-281.
Hamilton, K. & Jenkins, L. 2000. “A Gender Audit for Public Transport: A New Policy Tool in the Tackling of Social Exclusion.” Urban Studies 37(10):1793-1800.
6
Geography 446 2015 Course Outline 07/01/2015 Jain, S.L. 2005. “Violent Submission: Gendered Automobility.” Cultural Critique 61:186-214.
The following article is optional, it may provide some perspective as well.
I submit this offer before, but I’m not satisfied, but it has already past the revision date, so I submit the order again. I will upload that work as well.
