Impact of economic development on social services/society


-Position and exceptions, if any, are clearly stated. Organization of the argument is completely and clearly outlined and implemented. 4-5 marks    -Position is clearly stated. Organization of argument is clear in parts or only partially described and mostly implemented. 2-3 marks
-Position is vague. Organization of argument is missing, vague, or not consistently maintained. 0-1 marks

Body Paragraphs Refutation
Five (5) or more main points are well developed with supporting details. A critical global perspective is clearly acknowledged and discussed consistently.  11-15 marks
Five (5) or more main points are present but may lack detail and development in one or two. A critique of corporate economic development is assumed but not clearly discussed. 8-10 marks
Five (5) or more main points, but all lack development. Understanding of the contradictions of capitalist development is weak or missing /or vague, and/or
Less than five (5) main points, with poor development of ideas.
A critical global perspective to economic development is missing or vague 1-7 marks

Research/Use of Class Readings
Readings selected are highly relevant to the argument, are presented accurately and completely. Capitalist Contradictions are accurately described and all relevant components are included; relationship between economic development and problems faced by indigenous and rural peoples are clearly articulated. 8– 10 marks
Research is relevant to the argument and is mostly accurate and complete – there are some unclear components or some minor errors in the understanding of capitalist development or implications. The understanding is relevant and accurately described, some components may not be present. 5 -7 marks
Readings/Research selected are not relevant to the argument or  vague and incomplete – components are missing or inaccurate or unclear. The contradictions in global capitalist development are not clearly articulated and/or have incorrect or incomplete components. Relationship between economic development and poverty is unclear or inaccurate, major errors in the logic are present. 0-4 marks

-Conclusion is clearly stated and connections to the research/readings and position are clear and relevant. The underlying logic is explicit. 4-5 marks    -Conclusion is clearly stated and connections to research and position are mostly clear, some aspects may not be connected or minor errors in logic are present. 2-3 marks


Last Completed Projects

# topic title discipline academic level pages delivered
Writer's choice
1 hour 32 min
Wise Approach to
2 hours 19 min
1980's and 1990
2 hours 20 min
pick the best topic
2 hours 27 min
finance for leisure
2 hours 36 min

Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.

Use the order calculator below and get ordering with now! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page: