Morality
The issue of morality is significant because it creates diversity in behavior. Different people perceive morality in dissimilar manners and create numerous reactions to the same situation. Sociobiology suggests that the behavior that people display is from their respective evolutions. The relation between biology and social behavior causes a less threatening impact on morality than other causes. These other causes include traditional morality and religious views that determine the extents of morality in both modern and old societies.
The threat to morality by the above causes is multifaceted because of the following reasons. First, socio-biology has minimal threats to morality because of its factual explanations. This means that it cannot threaten; it only explains why some aspects are immoral. For example, sociobiology explains the causes of alcohol addiction among people. Socio-biology explains causes of these unacceptable conditions and provides possible treatment. This is not threatening to morality; it even results in the establishment of several acceptable behaviors.
Religion threatens morality in diverse societies because it fails to describe why people should be moral. Instead, it just threatens these people and in turn fails in creating moral behaviors. For example, several religious teachings suggest that there is punishment later for immoral society. This is a threat to morality because the possibility of punishments does not appear real in societies that have significant levels of civilization.
Not all the existing principles in ethics have intense relations with religion. The religious take on morality is misleading because religion does explain what people’s mind hold when they are immoral. Biology offers a better explanation than religion does because it has precise ideas. These ideas seem real because of proof that sociobiology keeps presenting.
People need to embrace the socio-biological views on morality instead of religious views to avoid confusion in their respective societies. This is because socio-biology suggests that the evolution of creatures determines their client levels of morality. There is sufficient evidence that evolution alters the traits of individuals. Later in their development, these individuals display distant changes in their morality.
The most significant cause of human behavior is the categories of genes that respective people have. These genes keep determining the ability of people to be either moral or immoral. For example, genes create focused traits in human beings and in turn establishing significance to the issue of morality. Human beings determine whether their actions are acceptable or not from moral expectations in their society.
The suggestion that mental development influences certain aspects of morality is true. This is because the human mind is the one that determines people reactions to the situations around them. The mind is the chief link between humanity and morality. People always engage their respective minds before they act on anything. These actions could be immoral or not but still have significant influence from the mind.
Other exemplary explications about the relation between morality and socio-biology include the issue of incest. Both religion and socio-biology agree that this entire phenomenon of incest is immoral. The difference in their explanations draws the conclusion that sociobiology makes more sense than religion does. This is because the former offers comprehensive explanations about the weakness of the creatures that result from incest. There should be minimal threats to morality for creation of perfect societies. Religious views on morality need to offer elaborate explanations for their claims against immorality.
