I’m coming back to you(writer 64813) for the rest of my paper. “Kant’s Interpretation of the Problem of Transference” was good. I’m pretty sure what you wrote will work for Part 1 and Part 2. I would really appreciate it if you could make sure in Part 1 that you identify what the issue is, that you’re going to argue, and what you intend to do or show, and in Part 2, you must give a brief account of how you intend to do it. You have to briefly identify how you intend to support the claim you made in Part 1. For the most part, what I need you to focus on is Part 3, 4 and 5. In Part 3 I need you to make explicit what is the argument offered by the author of the text in support of his claim. Now that you’ve identified the position with which you disagree in Part 3, now in Part 4, this is where you show why it’s wrong. Having identified the position with which you disagree, this is where you show why it is wrong. The fourth stage in constructing a text-based argumentative essay is the presentation of (a) reasons (arguments) in support of the claim that you asserted in Part 1, (b) arguments against the argument presented in Part 3, and (c) the implications of what was stated in the text (Part 3). As this is the “argumentative” part of the “argumentative essay,” Part 4 will be the longest section. Part 5 is the final part and conclusion and this is where you state the relationship between the issue at stake and the analysis that you have provided. That is the basic idea for the essay but the guidelines are much more detailed, which I must have these guidelines followed perfectly for the essay.
I’m going to provide you with the guidelines for the paper, in an attachment.
