For each argument, provide a brief explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of the argument. You might consider whether the argument is inductive or deductive, or you might provide a diagram of the argument. Think about how the two arguments compare to each other. Is one better than the other? If so, what makes that one better? Is each a fair presentation of what someone taking that position would say? Are the premises reasonable? How might each argument be made better?
Respond: Erin
Topic: Should Marijuana be legalized for recreational use?
Argument 1: (for)
Premise: Creates local jobs.
Premise: Creates new both local and state taxes.
Conclusion: Legalizing Marijuana benefits both local and state revenue.
Argument 2: (against)
Premise: Increases crime.
Premise: Makes it easier for kids to obtain it.
Conclusion: Legalizing Marijuana puts the public at risk.
The first argument is true. It has been shown to be a huge revenue machine in Colorado by adding both small businesses, for example-the shops who sell the products and large businesses who manufacture the product-all of which are taxed locally and through the state providing revenue, this makes it an inductive argument.
