• In developing and writing your answers, use only the course materials identified in Modules 1, 2, and 3—including the course lecture videos, films and film clips, Grigsby and other required reading. (The files that I attached.) Use of any outside materials or persons will result in a grade of Zero.
Exam #1 Questions. Write cohesive paragraph responses to the three sets of questions below. Write a minimum of 400 words (but no more than 500 words) to each of the three questions. Altogether you should write a total of between a minimum of 1200 words and a maximum of 1500 words. Note, you are not writing a single essay. Instead you are writing answers in cohesive paragraphs to each of the three questions. Grading rubrics for the questions’ answers are listed at the bottom of this document. The rest of the exam instructions are below. Question answers that are less than the required minimum of 400 words will receive a grade of Zero. Background: 33% Exam Question #1: What was so “revolutionary” about Locke’s political philosophy and why? What is evidence of the influence of classical liberalism on U.S. political culture, governmental institutions and politics in the U.S.? 33% Exam Question #2: Why have Burke’s ideas had so much less influence on the U.S. than those of Locke? Is there any evidence Burke’s philosophy and classical conservatism has had some influence on U.S. political culture, governmental institutions or politics? If yes, how? 34% Exam Question #3: What elements of classical liberalism and classical conservatism are found in contemporary conservatism in the U.S.? What elements of these two classical political ideologies are found in contemporary liberalism in the U.S.? Exam Instructions: • Use in-text citations for the points you discuss drawn from course materials. These in-text citations do not count for the essay word length. For example, if you make a point in your own words that was presented in your textbook use (Grig, pg. #) to cite it. For other course reading use citations such as this: (Locke, ch.2, pg #). For power-point video lectures (vl 3, 2)—meaning video lecture module 3, slide 2)) and for the powerpoint slides alone use: (ppt 3, 2). For films and PBS videos and film clips note the abbreviated names of the film or film clip. In short, cite all materials. If possible provide page numbers/slide numbers for the reading and lecture video for your in-text cites. To prevent in-text cites from being distracting and clunky, abbreviate the source name. You can provide a list of the abbreviated names of source material with their complete names at the end of your exam answers. On Writing: This is a formal writing assignment. For each answer, write using the “active” (not “passive”) voice, use complete sentences, cohesive paragraphs, and appropriate word usage, punctuation, grammar and spelling. Review the two documents–one on writing an essay and the second on what is and isn’t plagiarism— taken from Purdue University’s On-line Writing Lab posted in this Exam Module. Go to the Purdue OWL website to review the rules on writing cohesive paragraphs, writing with an “active” not passive voice, and writing using correct word usage, punctuation and grammar. Exam 1 Content & Writing Grading Rubrics 33-30 Excellent The Answer Content is very good or excellent in overall quality. 29-26 Above Average The Answer Content lacks at least one of the above qualities, but is above average in quality. 25-21 Average The Answer Content lacks at least two or three of the above qualities. 20-0 Unacceptable The Answer Content fails to demonstrate knowledge of the course facts/concepts/theories/principles Grade Interpretation Exam 1 Answer Writing Criteria 33-30 Excellent The Answer Writing is logically organized and sentences are well structured. 30-26 Above Average The Answer Writing is adequately organized. 25-21 Average The Answer Writing’s organization is adequate. 20-0 Unacceptable The Answer Writing is poorly organized and/or has serious errors in sentence structure, word usage, spelling, punctuation and/or grammar. As a result it is difficult to understand. |