Analysis of Lewis Thomas “Medusa and the Snail”
In his article “The Medusa and the Snail”, scientist Lewis Thomas guarantees that people are assembled to commit errors. Besides, he contends that confusions are the premises for human advancement. As indicated by his cases, there are constantly good and bad decisions of which one needs an equivalent offset. Wrong decisions are important and one gains from them by experimentation. Thomas contends that errors are regular and that they serve as a paramount aide towards finding the new and making advancement. Moreover, he fights that all new sorts of speculations are made contrary to a past perspective.
For each contention there must be a counter-argument, hence, Thomas guarantees that in civil arguments there is a common comprehension that one is correct and the other off base. Along these lines, Thomas keeps up that “arriving on the wrong side” is in charge of the best human accomplishments. I concur with Thomas that a mistake is the premise for advancement on the grounds that confronted with mistakes people are pushed to adjust them. Be that as it may, I discover his argument to be controversial on the grounds that in “Medusa and the Snail”, Thomas expresses that new thoughts and advancements are made contrary to past achievements. Actually, the best human accomplishments have been made when past points of reference have been adjusted. Experimentation is not about trying different things with the obscure; it is about enhancing what is present.
I solidly cannot help contradicting Thomas that new thinking is made contrary to past thoughts. On the off chance that this was thus, then there would be no coherence on the planet which is vital for advancement. Additionally, if each era made new beginnings and disregarded the past achievements, just trials would be made yet no blunders. Without mistakes the inspiration to enhance is missing in this manner yielding no achievement. Genuine progress is accomplished when one forms off of past accomplishments and proceeds with the conventions of the past while adjusting them. As has been obvious of all instances of history, advancement has frequently been because of civic establishments acquiring from their past and one another.
