Epigenetic influence on immunity
Pathogens are a major initiator of the t cells action in the body. The T cells hence have provided an avenue for the exploration for the mechanisms that are printable for the control of inducible genes. Different individual genes have always responded to different antigenic stimulations in unique ways. As such it has been noted that the actions transcription aspects and epigenetic techniques and the chromatin bases of the respective genes is responsible for these reactions. The knowledge of the intricacies related to the chromatin actions as well as the epigenetic techniques that are responsible for transcription management has broaden in relation to the current studies that have been carried out (Kondilis, 2012,4).
These mechanisms are like the presence as well as the absence of modification ignites such as histone which is responsible for the unique mark of the epigenetic for the dynamic as well as the non-dynamic genes. The unique signatures are constantly added or reduced in number by the epigenetic enzymes that are comprised of a cluster of histone alteration enzymes, and also included is the lately documented chromatin allied signalling kinases. On the other hand, the chromatin changes complexes substantially change the structure of the chromatin appearance of the t cells with the definition of the t-cell epigenone (Dwaipayan, 2010, 44).
This study will investigate the complex regulation relating to the gene expression that takes place in the immune system. Epigenesis of the t-cell takes place in the perspective of the extracellular cytokine milieu which is encouraged by the presence of pathogens as well as microbes together with some other stimulus receptors for the t-cells. The end of these inductions results in identification of T helper linages, the whole of this process takes place in a combination of factors involving numerous activities of the transcription elements that are responsible for the formation of specific unique transcriptomes. In this way, ignitable but rather collected lively major regulators work together with relative factors such as signal transducers as well as inducers of transcriptions that are able to detect the fate of the outside environment.
The ability of a composition of unique transcriptome formation is relatively linked to the chromatin changes that have a major effect on the key cis factors and also on the remodelling of the general genomic composition(Hirst, 2009, 23). As a result of this the signal transitions as well as epigenetics processes are connected in these progressions of differentiation. The T cells are able to differentiate in a variety of cells such as effector, helper as well as regulatory T cells. The numbers of cells of which the T cells are able to differentiate to are often newly discovered. The differentiation activities have been found to be of a great significance in the host defence systems as well as immunoregulatory, in addition the activities act as representatives of acknowledgeable and a tactile system for illustrating the fundamental principles that are involved in a cellular identification and gene regulation (Dwaipayan, 2010, 40).
The T cells subsets can be attributed to stability and have often been related to specific backgrounds, there have been observed increasing cases of remodelling in them. This factor has attributed to the question as to what are the factors that are responsible for the management of the stability as well as the occurrence of epigenesist in the cellular phenotype.
In relation to the cells, differentiation processes marks the combination of intrinsic and the extrinsic elements that are responsible for the management of the activities of the cells. In the scenario of segregating CD4 T cells (Hirst, 2009, 27) there is a lot that has been identified in the trans elements that are responsible for the ignition of the background commitment.
Primitive CD4 t cels fragment into T cells whose results can be identified by the common identifier of effectors cytokines that is the product, the major transcription elements expressed as well as the kind of microbial pathogens that are being controlled. Precisely, Th1is responsible for the expression of IFN- γ as well as the transcription factor T-bet; in addition, it also acts as the manager for the intracellular pathogens. On the other hand, Th2 cells are responsible for the countenance of interleukin 4 as well as the Gata3.
In common perspective, cell phenotype can be the as a product of the expression of the main controlling transcription elements. In calls that are not T cells, typical examples are like the main regulators which are like MyoD and the Pax group of transcription factors. Manifestations of these transcription elements are significant and are all that are needed for the ultimate cell position determination. It has been noted that these elements are directly bond in respect of genes that take place in specification (Bierne, 2012, 147)
The ability of the T cells to differentiate into distinctive helper lineages needs assistance from the extracellular environment. These conditions can be provided for in the formula of antigen co stimulatory molecules, molecules that are able to adhere and other forms of cytokines. An extrinsic regulation that is established by the CD4 cells during the early encounter with antigen bestowing cell can then be transformed to be cell intrinsic remodelling. There are various processes of transcription elements that are responsible for the combination of the establishment of every T helper groups. There are various factors that determine the T cells differentiation processes. Stat1 as well as Stat4 are all accredited to ignite T-bet which is also in known to work together with HIx, Runnx3 as well as Ets group in an attempt to encourage and inhibit IL-4 transcription. T-bet is also known to prevent the actions of Gata3 as well as Rorc and hence acting as a protagonist to the Th2 and Th17 differentiation (Bierne, 2012, 146).
There are various cytokines that are responsible for the stimulation of Stat3, which are responsible for the induction of Rorc, the main moderator for the Th17. On the other hand, there are transcription factors such as aryl hydrocarbon receptors that are believed to be responsible for the encouragement of IL-17 expression. IL-2 is belived to have a significant role in the control of Treg population. Treg activation is activated by IL-2, the Foxp3 gene is then observed to bind to the stat5 which is then responsible for the formation of Foxp3. Foxp3 is then responsible for the programming of Treg cells, on the other hand, foxp3 can also combine to the Roryt and as a result hinder with the production of Th-17(Goodbourn, 200, 2344).
The pathological significance of epigenetic gene control is an area of study that has been of great significance in the subject of oncology; however, such techniques have been identified to be the contributing factors in a variety of immunological diseases. This is further backed up by the fact that the external environment has a part in the initiation of these health disorders. For instance systemic lupus erythematosus is a kind of autoimmune disorder that the etiology is not known in relation to genetic composition, hormonal as well as environmental factors. Epigenetic processes are believed to have an influence in the lupus derived from the previous analysis that medications that act by prohibiting the process of DNA methylation could initiate the disorder. On the other hand, while various studies have often proven that this disorder is as a result of genetic elements, other studies have revealed other influences as well. On this note, it has been documented that that CD4 T cells obtained from patients with lupus erythematous also have evidence of altered modifications in their histone (Teperino, 2013, 1616).
Another disease that elaborates the pathological importance of epigenetic gene control is asthma. The disease has a genetic constituent, regardless of this; the current rise in the occurrence of this condition cannot be understood by the basis of genetics. The countenance of cytokine genes and loci that are responsible for the pathogenesis of the disease are highly dependent on epigenetic processes. Other environmental activities such as smoking of cigarettes as well as some other environmental pollutants are believed to be responsible for DNA methylation and other modifications such as histone and chromatin actions (Tiffany, 2009).
In summary, it should be noted that the current analytical studies that have been conducted have been responsible for the existing knowledge on the perspective of the cell phenotype. It is now possible to view the “-ome-” processes in the identification of the cellular phenotypes. Combination of the “-omic-” materials to come up with tangible outcome can prove to be a challenge(Backdahl, 2009, 175). Having these currently developed information bank and combining with GWAS information in the studies of the human diseases has already proven a brighter future with the hopes of mechanistic knowledge in the deeper elaboration of their pathophysiology (Tiffany, 2009). More researches have continued to dig deeper of the information in the gene desert areas of the genome. A clear understanding of the various interactions of the genome and the epigenome provides a future that will give a different view of the manner in which T cells affect health in relation to disease (Backdahl, 2009, 175).
In addition, epigenome has been identified to be dynamically dependent on signals that are present in the microenvironment. On this note, the elements that are responsible for the management of the epigenetic remodelling have been increasingly identified as additions to the signal transduction processes (Kondilis, 2012,4). The processes responsible for the transcription elements identify chromatin changing enzymes in the attempt to arrange the epigenome have not been clearly understood. Regardless of this there is confidence that much will be unveiled in the near future on the relationship of the nucleosome biology and signal transduction through biochemical means(Hirst, 2009, 23). This is believed to be able to answer the complicated perspective of the lymphocyte cell phenotype, instigation as well as the control responsible for the gene expression (Teperino, 2013, 1639).
References
Backdahl, L, Bushell, A, Beck, S 2009,“Inflammatory signalling as mediator of epigenetic modulation in tissue-specific chronic inflammation”. Int J Biochem& Cell Biol vol. 41: pp176-184
Bierne, H, Hampn, M,Cossart, P 2012,“Epigenetics and bacterial infections”Cold Spring HarbPerspect Med vol. 2 no. 12, pp1027
Dwaipayan, A, Anirban, B, 2010 “Epigenetic modulation of host: new insights into immune evasion by virusesNational”Brain Research Centre, Manesar, Haryana,vol122 pp50
Goodbourn, S, Didcock, L, Randall, R, 2000 “Interferons: cell signalling, immune modulation, antiviral response and virusncountermeasures”. Vol81 pp2341–2364
Hirst, M,Marra, M, 2009, “Epigenetics and human disease”.Int J Biochem& Cell Biolvol41: pp136-146
Kondilis, H, Wade, P, 2012 “Epigenetics and the adaptive response”Mol Aspects of Med, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. vol 06 pp008
Naito, T,Taniuchi, I, 2013 “Roles of repressive epigenetic machinery in lineage decision of T cells”Immunologyvol 139, pp151-157
Richardson B, 2007, “epigenetics of autoimmunity”. nature clinical practice rheumatologyvol3 pp521-527
Teperino, R, Lempradl, A, Pospisilik J 2013 “Bridging epigenomics and complex disease: the basics. Cell Mol Life Sci”vol70: pp1609-1621
Tiffany,H,Shalini, O Anjana R, Tiffany H,2009 “Affiliations Department of Pathology”,Harvard Medical School, Immune Disease Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
